Tidwell v. Martel
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/28/2013 ORDERING that the 28 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Respondent's 18 motion to dismiss this action as time-barred is DENIED. Respondent is directed to file an answer to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUAN M. TIDWELL, SR.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:11-cv-0489 KJM CKD P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
WILLIAM KNIPP, et al.,
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as
19
provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 18, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully
27
reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 18, 2013, are adopted in full;
3
2. Respondent’s August 24, 2012, motion to dismiss this action as time-barred (ECF No.
4
5
18) is denied; and
3. Respondent is directed to file an answer to petitioner’s habeas petition within sixty
6
days from the date of this order.
7
DATED: August 28, 2013.
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?