Taylor v. Superior Court of California et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/11 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action; and Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order.(Dillon, M)

(PC) Taylor v. Superior Court of California et al

Doc. 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is incomplete and will therefore be denied. Plaintiff will be granted thirty days to submit a new request on a fully completed form. Plaintiff is cautioned that the form includes a section that must be completed by a prison official, and the application form must be accompanied by a certified copy of plaintiff's prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's February 18, 2011 request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice; ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT ANTHONY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER No. CIV S-11-0494 DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:12 tayl0494.3d

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action; and 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order or seek an extension of time to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: March 9, 2011.

2