Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/8/2011 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING Defendant Aramark; DISMISSING Plaintiff's due process claims against defendants Solano County and Solano County Sheriff's Department. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CLAUDE YOUNG, III,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. CIV S-11-0505 GEB GGH P

vs.

13

ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE

14

PROVIDER, et al.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

18

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

19

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

21

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

22

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full;

2

2. Defendant Aramark is dismissed from this action; and

3

3. Plaintiff’s due process claims against defendants Solano County and the

4

Solano County Sheriff’s Department are dismissed.

5

Dated: December 8, 2011

6
7
8

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2