Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al

Filing 13

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CLAUDE YOUNG, III,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. CIV S-11-0505 GEB GGH P

vs.

13

ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE

14

PROVIDER, et al.

15

Defendants.

16

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

17

By order filed October 17, 2011, plaintiff was ordered, within thirty days, to

18

submit documents for service by the United States Marshall and to provide the court with a

19

completed Notice of Submission of Documents. The thirty day period has now expired, and

20

plaintiff has not submitted a completed Notice or the documents, or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.

22
23

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

25

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

26

////

1

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

3

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

4

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

5

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: December 13, 2011

7

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10

GGH:rb
youn0505.fsc

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2