Martel v. Cadjew et al
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER 39 for Dismissal signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/2012. Parties agree to dismiss action with prejudice as to all defendants. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
JAMES W. RUSHFORD, ESQ.
State Bar No. 88739
AMANDA R. STEVENS, ESQ.
State Bar No. 252350
RUSHFORD & BONOTTO, LLP
2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 495
Sacramento, California 95825
(916) 565-0590
5
6
Attorneys for Defendants,
FRANK CADJEW and JULIE CADJEW
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD MARTEL, an individual,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
vs.
FRANK & JULIE CADJEW, a Married
Couple, UNKNOWN DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
) Case No.: 11-CV-00509-JAM-EFB) PS
)
)
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties to this action
18
that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice
19
as to all defendants.
20
Dated: March 5, 2012
21
By: /s/_____________________
22
Richard Martel, PLAINTIFF PRO SE
23
Dated: March 5, 2012
RUSHFORD & BONOTTO, LLP
24
25
26
27
By:/s/_____________________
JAMES W. RUSHFORD
Attorney for Defendants, FRANK
CADJEW and JULIE CADJEW
28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED: the above matter is ordered
2
dismissed with prejudice.
3
Dated:
3/5/2012
4
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
PROOF OF SERVICE
(CCP §§1013(a) and 2015.5)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I, RACHEL PETERSON, declare that:
I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in Sacramento
County, California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this
action.
My business address is 2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 495,
Sacramento, California 95825.
On March 5, 2012, I served the attached document entitled
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL on the following parties as listed below:
8
9
10
Plaintiff in Pro Per
Phone: (916) 622-4404
Fax:
richardmartel@gmail.com
Richard Martel
P.O. Box 634
Roseville, CA 95661
11
12
13
The following is the procedure in which service of this document
was affected:
Via First Class Mail (placing sealed envelope with
postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for outgoing mail in
accordance with this office’s practice, whereby mail is deposited in a U.S.
mailbox in Sacramento County at the close of the business day).
XX
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Via Notice of Electronic Service – Counsel who have
consented to electronic service have been automatically served by the
Notice of Electronic Filing, which is automatically generated by United
States District Court Electronic Case Filing OR Lexis/Nexis Electronic Filing
and Service at the time said document was filed.
Via Personal Service – By personally delivering or
causing to be personally delivered a true copy thereof in a sealed
envelope(s).
22
23
24
Via Facsimile Machine before sealing envelope. The
document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and the transmission
was reported as complete and without error. The transmission report was
properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine.
25
26
27
28
Via Overnight Delivery Service – I caused such
envelope(s) to be deposited in a box or other facility maintained by the
express service carrier or delivered to an authorized courier or driver
authorized by the express service carrier with delivery fees paid or
provided.
3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
2
3
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
March 5, 2012, in Sacramento, California.
4
5
RACHEL PETERSON
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?