Penton v. Hubard et al
Filing
229
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/18/20 GRANTING 228 Plaintiff's Motion. Plaintiff Anthony Penton is allowed up to 40 pages for his opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Donahoo, Salas, Walker, Bradford, Lynch, Virga, Morrow, and Gaddi in this action on June 10, 2020 220 . (Plummer, M)
1
8
Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN: 206822)
hfrahn@stblaw.com
Michael R. Morey (SBN: 313003)
michael.morey@stblaw.com
Justin J. Calderon (SBN: 321405)
justin.calderon@stblaw.com
Kourtney J. Kinsel (SBN: 324370)
kourtney.kinsel@stblaw.com
Raul G. Duran (SBN: 324248)
raul.duran@stblaw.com
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 251-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 251-5002
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Penton
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
14
15
ANTHONY PENTON,
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:11-cv-00518 TLN KJN P
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
LAYTON JOHNSON, JR., JAMES
WALKER, TIMOTHY VIRGA, BRYAN
DONAHOO, JOLENE NUNEZ, JANICE
BRADFORD, ROLF MORROW, RONALD
GADDI, JOHN LYNCH, GILBERT SALAS,
AND DOES 1 THROUGH 13,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-00518-TLN-KJN
1
2
Plaintiff filed a motion to exceed the page limit for his opposition to the motion for
summary judgment.
3
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 228) is granted; and
5
2. Plaintiff Anthony Penton is allowed up to forty (40) pages for his opposition to the
6
Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Donahoo, Salas, Walker, Bradford, Lynch,
7
Virga, Morrow, and Gaddi in this action on June 10, 2020 (ECF No. 220).
8
Dated: June 18, 2020
9
10
pent0518.pg2
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-00518-TLN-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?