Penton v. Hubard et al

Filing 271

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/21/22 AFFIRMING 257 the order of the magistrate judge filed 2/10/22. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY PENTON,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:11-cv-00518-TLN-KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

L. JOHNSON, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On March 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request under seal for reconsideration of the magistrate

18

judge’s order filed February 10, 2022, also under seal. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a

19

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon

20

review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling

21

was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration (ECF No. 265), the

23

order of the magistrate judge filed February 10, 2022 (ECF No. 257), is affirmed.

24

DATED: March 21, 2022

25
26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
1