Hughes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/2013 ORDERING that, within 14 days, defedant Dr. Malet shall pay to the USM the sum of $241.28, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service; the court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARD C. HUGHES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-00530 GEB DAD P v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking 18 19 relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 3, 2013, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon the 20 21 defendants in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before 22 attempting personal service on defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned within sixty 23 days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the defendant in accordance with the 24 provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without 25 prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a 26 waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal 27 service. 28 ///// 1 1 On October 23, 2013, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 2 form showing total charges of $241.28 for effecting personal service on defendant Dr. Malet. 3 The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to defendant Dr. Malet on July 19, 4 2013, and that no response thereto was received. 5 Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows: 6 An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under Rule 4(e), (f), or (h) has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the summons. . . . 7 8 If a defendant located within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court must impose on the defendant: 9 10 (A) the expenses later incurred in making service; and 11 (B) the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, of any motion required to collect those service expenses. 12 13 14 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1), (2)(A), (B). The court finds that defendant Dr. Malet was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d) 15 to waive service and failed to comply with the request. 16 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 17 1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendant Dr. Malet shall pay to the 18 United States Marshal the sum of $241.28 unless within that time defendant files a written 19 statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to 20 extend this fourteen day period. 21 22 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. Dated: December 3, 2013 23 24 25 DAD:4 hugh530.taxcost 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?