Hughes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/2013 ORDERING that, within 14 days, defedant Dr. Malet shall pay to the USM the sum of $241.28, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service; the court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BERNARD C. HUGHES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:11-cv-00530 GEB DAD P
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking
18
19
relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 3, 2013, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon the
20
21
defendants in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before
22
attempting personal service on defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned within sixty
23
days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the defendant in accordance with the
24
provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without
25
prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a
26
waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal
27
service.
28
/////
1
1
On October 23, 2013, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285
2
form showing total charges of $241.28 for effecting personal service on defendant Dr. Malet.
3
The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to defendant Dr. Malet on July 19,
4
2013, and that no response thereto was received.
5
Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
6
An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service
under Rule 4(e), (f), or (h) has a duty to avoid unnecessary
expenses of serving the summons. . . .
7
8
If a defendant located within the United States fails, without good
cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located
within the United States, the court must impose on the defendant:
9
10
(A) the expenses later incurred in making service; and
11
(B) the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, of any
motion required to collect those service expenses.
12
13
14
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1), (2)(A), (B).
The court finds that defendant Dr. Malet was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)
15
to waive service and failed to comply with the request.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendant Dr. Malet shall pay to the
18
United States Marshal the sum of $241.28 unless within that time defendant files a written
19
statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to
20
extend this fourteen day period.
21
22
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal.
Dated: December 3, 2013
23
24
25
DAD:4
hugh530.taxcost
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?