Bock et al v. County of Sutter et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/27/12 ORDERING that Plaintiffs may file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 AARON J. FISCHER – 247391 2 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: 4 Facsimile: Email: 5 (415) 433-6830 (415) 433-7104 egalvan@rbg-law.com afischer@rbg-law.com 6 GERI LYNN GREEN – 127709 LAW OFFICES OF GERI LYNN GREEN, LC 7 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 901 San Francisco, California 94104-4166 8 Telephone: Facsimile: 9 Email: (415) 982-2600 (415) 358-4562 gerilynngreen@gmail.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 Estate of RODNEY LOUIS BOCK, deceased, by 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 and through CYNDIE DENNY BOCK, as Administrator; KIMBERLY BOCK; KELLIE BOCK; HILLARY BOCK; M.B., minor through her mother and guardian ad litem Cyndie Denny Bock; and LAURA LYNN BOCK; Estate of ROBERT BOCK, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SUTTER; COUNTY OF YUBA; J. PAUL PARKER, Sutter County Sheriff’s Department Sheriff; DAVID SAMSON, Sutter County Jail Division Commander; NORMAN BIDWELL, Sutter County Jail Corrections Lieutenant; JOHN S. ZIL; CHRISTOPHER BARNETT; BOBBY JOE LITTLE; DAVID CALAPINI; SHAUN FLIEHMAN; R.C.; KATY MULLIN; DENISE MCGINNIS; SUTTER COUNTY JAIL FACILITY MANAGER; and Does I through XL, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 2:11-cv-00536 (MCE) (GGH) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 26 27 28 [615522-1] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek to file a Third Amended Complaint, a copy of which is 3 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 4 WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint seeks only to clarify that the Seventh 5 Claim for Relief is alleged solely against individual Defendants ZIL and BARNETT and 6 DOES I through XL, and to do so by deleting Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER and 7 COUNTY OF YUBA from the heading of the Seventh Claim for Relief; and 8 WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with Plaintiffs’ agreement to remove 9 Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER and COUNTY OF YUBA with respect to the Seventh 10 Claim for Relief, see Dkt. No. 16 at 20 n.8, and with the Court’s Memorandum and Order 11 of February 8, 2012, see Dkt. No. 26 at 24; 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13 15(a)(2) and Local Rule 220, by and between the parties hereto through their respective 14 attorneys of record that Plaintiffs may file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto. 15 The parties further stipulate that all defendants will have thirty (30) days in which to 16 respond to the Third Amended Complaint once it is filed. 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 DATED: March 23, 2012 19 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 20 21 By: /s/ Ernest Galvan Ernest Galvan 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 DATED: March 23, 2012 24 PORTER SCOTT 25 By: /s/ John Whitefleet John R. Whitefleet 26 27 Attorneys for Defendants 28 [615522-1] 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs may 3 file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: March 27, 2012 6 7 8 ______________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [615522-1] 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?