Bock et al v. County of Sutter et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/27/12 ORDERING that Plaintiffs may file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065
AARON J. FISCHER – 247391
2 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94104-1823
Telephone:
4 Facsimile:
Email:
5
(415) 433-6830
(415) 433-7104
egalvan@rbg-law.com
afischer@rbg-law.com
6 GERI LYNN GREEN – 127709
LAW OFFICES OF GERI LYNN GREEN, LC
7 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 901
San Francisco, California 94104-4166
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
9 Email:
(415) 982-2600
(415) 358-4562
gerilynngreen@gmail.com
10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14 Estate of RODNEY LOUIS BOCK, deceased, by
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
and through CYNDIE DENNY BOCK, as
Administrator; KIMBERLY BOCK; KELLIE
BOCK; HILLARY BOCK; M.B., minor through
her mother and guardian ad litem Cyndie Denny
Bock; and LAURA LYNN BOCK; Estate of
ROBERT BOCK,
Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF SUTTER; COUNTY OF YUBA; J.
PAUL PARKER, Sutter County Sheriff’s
Department Sheriff; DAVID SAMSON, Sutter
County Jail Division Commander; NORMAN
BIDWELL, Sutter County Jail Corrections
Lieutenant; JOHN S. ZIL; CHRISTOPHER
BARNETT; BOBBY JOE LITTLE; DAVID
CALAPINI; SHAUN FLIEHMAN; R.C.; KATY
MULLIN; DENISE MCGINNIS; SUTTER
COUNTY JAIL FACILITY MANAGER; and Does
I through XL, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:11-cv-00536 (MCE) (GGH)
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
FILING OF THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
26
27
28
[615522-1]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek to file a Third Amended Complaint, a copy of which is
3 attached hereto as Exhibit A;
4
WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint seeks only to clarify that the Seventh
5 Claim for Relief is alleged solely against individual Defendants ZIL and BARNETT and
6 DOES I through XL, and to do so by deleting Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER and
7 COUNTY OF YUBA from the heading of the Seventh Claim for Relief; and
8
WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with Plaintiffs’ agreement to remove
9 Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER and COUNTY OF YUBA with respect to the Seventh
10 Claim for Relief, see Dkt. No. 16 at 20 n.8, and with the Court’s Memorandum and Order
11 of February 8, 2012, see Dkt. No. 26 at 24;
12
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
13 15(a)(2) and Local Rule 220, by and between the parties hereto through their respective
14 attorneys of record that Plaintiffs may file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto.
15 The parties further stipulate that all defendants will have thirty (30) days in which to
16 respond to the Third Amended Complaint once it is filed.
17
Respectfully submitted,
18 DATED: March 23, 2012
19
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
20
21
By: /s/ Ernest Galvan
Ernest Galvan
22
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23 DATED: March 23, 2012
24
PORTER SCOTT
25
By: /s/ John Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
26
27
Attorneys for Defendants
28
[615522-1]
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs may
3 file the Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: March 27, 2012
6
7
8
______________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[615522-1]
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?