Bock et al v. County of Sutter et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/06/12 ORDERING that the 53 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED; plaintiff shall file their Fourth Amended Complaint within 5 days. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

ESTATE OF RODNEY LOUIS BOCK,
et al.,

No. 2:11-cv-00536-MCE-GGH

Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14

ORDER
COUNTY OF SUTTER, et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17
----oo0oo----

18
19

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Leave to File Fourth

20

Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 53), in response to which Defendants filed a Statement

21

of Non-Opposition, (ECF No. 54). In light of that non-opposition, and because leave to

22

amend should be freely given, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiffs’

23

Motion (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED.1

24

///

25
///
26
1

27
28

Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, the Court orders this
matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). The hearing on Plaintiffs’
Motion, currently set for November 15, 2012, is hereby vacated.
1

1

Plaintiffs are directed to file and serve their proposed Fourth Amended Complaint not

2

later than five (5) days following the date this Order is electronically filed.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: November 6, 2012
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

DEAC_Signature-END:

10
11

c4d6b0d3

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2