Sabetta et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 8/17/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANNE SABETTA, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-554 JAM CKD PS
vs.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
By order filed June 7, 2011, plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed and thirty days
17
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On July 21, 2011, plaintiffs were granted a
18
fourteen day extension of time to comply with the June 7, 2011 order. That time period has now
19
expired, and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s
20
order.
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
25
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
26
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's
1
1
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
2
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
3
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: August 17, 2011
5
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
4
9
sabetta.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?