Ames v. Swarthout

Filing 14

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/25/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY M. AMES, Petitioner, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-0565 MCE JFM (HC) G. SWARTHOUT, 14 15 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by 17 the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 18 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More 19 than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and 20 petitioner has failed to notify the Court of a current address. 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: July 25, 2011. 6 7 8 9 /mp014;ames0565.133a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?