California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Sacramento Area Sewer District et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/31/2011 ORDERING 9 the County and SASD shall file their response to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 7/26/2011. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Layne Friedrich (Bar No. 195431)
[e-mail]
Drevet Hunt (Bar No. 240487)
[e-mail]
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.
1004-A O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, California 94129
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN
A Professional Corporation
ROBERTA L. LARSON, (SBN 191705)
Email: [e-mail]
KANWARJIT S. DUA, ESQ. (SBN 214591)
Email: [e-mail]
813 Sixth Street, Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-2403
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and
SACRAMENTO AREA SEWER DISTRICT

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

Plaintiff,

23
24

Civil Case No.: 2:11-cv-00575 KJM-EFB

v.
Civil Local Rule 144
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political
subdivision of the State of California,
SACRAMENTO AREA SEWER DISTRICT, a
county sanitation district;
Defendants.
Stip. to Extend Time to File Response; Order

1

Case No. 2:11-CV-00575-KJM-EFB

1
2

WHEREAS, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) filed its complaint in the
above-captioned case on March 1, 2011;

3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the summons and complain on Defendants on May 26, 2011;

4

WHEREAS, Defendants acknowledged receipts of the summons and complaint on May 27,

5
6
7
8
9
10

2011;
WHEREAS, the standard time for the County of Sacramento and the Sacramento Area Sewer
District (SASD) to respond to the Plaintiff’s complaint is twenty-one (21) days from May 27, 2011;
WHEREAS, the parties have exchanged written proposals for settlement and are in the process
of negotiating specific terms, and the parties believe that settlement is likely. Therefore, the parties agree
that an extension for Defendant to respond to the complaint will save resources.

11

WHEREAS, there have been no previous extensions of time in this case.

12

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between CPSA and the County and the

13

SASD, through their respective counsel of record, that the County and SASD shall have an extension of

14

sixty (60) days to and including July 26, 2011, within which to respond to CSPA’s complaint. The

15

Parties enter this stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144.

16

Respectfully submitted,

17
18

LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.

19
20

Dated: May 27, 2011

21
22

By: /s/ Drevet Hunt_______________________________
Drevet Hunt, Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE

23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. to Extend Time to File Response; Order

2

Case No. 2:11-CV-00575-KJM-EFB

1

SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN
A Professional Corporation

2
3
4

Dated: May 27, 2011

5
6

By: _/s/ Kanwarjit S. Dua (as authorized on May 27, 2011)
Kanwarjit S. Dua, Attorney for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and
SACRAMENTO AREA SEWER
DISTRICT

7
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political
subdivision of the state of California

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. to Extend Time to File Response; Order

3

Case No. 2:11-CV-00575-KJM-EFB

Order

1
2
3
4
5

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, the County and SASD shall file their response to
Plaintiff’s complaint on or before July 26, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2011.

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. to Extend Time to File Response; Order

4

Case No. 2:11-CV-00575-KJM-EFB