Boyton v. Federal Correction Institution Dublin

Filing 115

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/10/16 ORDERING that the Expert Witness Disclosure is EXTENDED to 2/6/2017, and Dispositive Motions EXTENDED to 6/1/2017. All other provisions in the May 19, 2016 pretrial scheduling order shall remain in full force and effect. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney BOBBIE J. MONTOYA Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2775 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant United States of America 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PEGGY BOYNTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 2:11-cv-00623 MCE EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE DEADLINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counter-Claimant, 18 19 v. 20 PEGGY BOYNTON, 21 Counter-Defendant. _______________________________________ 22 23 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Peggy Boynton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant/Counter-Claimant 24 United States of America (“Defendant”), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby agree 25 and STIPULATE, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows: 26 1. On October 5, 2016, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution and 27 noticed it for hearing for November 3, 2016. ECF 107. By Minute Order issued November 1, 2016, 28 Defendant’s motion was taken under submission. ECF 111. On November 2, 2016, the Court issued Stipulation & Order to Extend Pretrial Schedule Deadlines 1 1 a Minute Order, therein noting that Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non- 2 opposition in violation of E.D. Cal. R. 230(c), and ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing, not 3 later than ten (10) days following the date the order was electronically filed, as to why Plaintiff’s 4 case should not be dismissed with prejudice. ECF 112. 5 2. Under the current scheduling order, expert witness disclosure is due December 5, 6 2016, and the deadline for dispositive motions is March 23, 2017, and any such motions must be 7 filed at least eight weeks before the hearing, to wit, on or before January 26, 2017. ECF 103. 8 9 10 11 3. Defendant has hired an expert to support its defense of Plaintiff’s claim. Given that Plaintiff’s claim could be dismissed, the Government does not want to have to expend hundreds of dollars it is likely to incur in expert discovery-related costs. 4. Accordingly, the parties hereby agree to a 60-day extension of the expert witness 12 disclosure date and deadline for dispositive motions, subject to the Court’s approval, in order to give 13 the Court time to rule on Defendant’s motion to dismiss and avoid Defendant having to incur a 14 costly, unnecessary expense. If said motion is granted, it would moot Defendant’s need for its 15 expert witness. Respectfully submitted, 16 17 CABLE GALLAGHER DATED: November 10, 2016 18 /s/ Mark T. Gallagher (authorized by 11/4/16 email) 19 20 MARK T. GALLAGHER 21 Attorney for Plaintiff/CounterDefendant Peggy Boynton 22 23 DATED: November 10, 2016 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney 24 /s/ Bobbie J. Montoya 25 BOBBIE J. MONTOYA Assistant United States Attorney 26 27 Attorneys for Defendant/CounterClaimant United States of America 28 Stipulation & Order to Extend Pretrial Schedule Deadlines 2 ORDER 1 Finding good cause, the foregoing stipulation between the parties is hereby APPROVED. 2 3 The deadlines set forth in the Fourth Pretrial Scheduling Order, ECF 103, are extended as follows: 4 Expert Witness Disclosure: February 6, 2017 5 Dispositive Motions: June 1, 2017. 6 All other provisions in the May 19, 2016 pretrial scheduling order shall remain in full force and 7 effect. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2016 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation & Order to Extend Pretrial Schedule Deadlines 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?