Sanchez-Gonzalez v. Felker

Filing 12

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2011 ORDERING that petitioner show cause, within 14 days, why his failure to oppose 10 respondent's motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, or he shall file an opposition. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMANUEL M. SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ, 11 12 13 14 15 Petitioner, No. 2:11-cv-0637 KJN P Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE vs. T. FELKER, / 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with an application for 17 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to proceed before 18 the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On June 3, 2011, respondent filed a 19 motion to dismiss on the ground that this action was filed beyond the one year statute of 20 limitations period. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) 21 provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement 22 of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 23 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, 24 within fourteen days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s June 3, 2011 motion to dismiss 25 should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, or he shall file an 26 opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an 1 1 opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in the dismissal of this action. 2 DATED: July 11, 2011 3 4 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 sanc0637.46h 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?