Williams v. Huffman et al

Filing 85

ORDER adopting 80 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/29/12: Plaintiff's April 26, 2012 motion for preliminary injunction is denied 76 .(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MARIO WILLIAMS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:11-cv-0638 GEB KJN P

vs.
JASON T. HUFFMAN, M.D., et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On June 1, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

21

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

/////
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 1, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2

2. Plaintiff’s April 26, 2012 motion for preliminary injunction (dkt. no. 76) is

3

denied.

4

Dated: June 29, 2012

5
6
7

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2