Alexander, et al v. CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al
Filing
184
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/27/17 ORDERING that the above-captioned case and all named and fictitious defendants thereto, including any and all individually-named defendants who were previously dismissed without prejudice, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear his/her own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JONATHAN NICHOLAS
ALEXANDER et al.,
Case No. 2:11-CV-00640-TLN-CKD
[HON. TROY L. NUNLEY]
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
15
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS WITH
PREJUDICE
CDCR et al.,
[Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii)]
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING based on the stipulation of the parties, the
parties having entered into a settlement and release agreement that fully and finally
20
resolves the above-captioned litigation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
21
above-captioned case and all named and fictitious defendants thereto, including
22
any and all individually-named defendants who were previously dismissed without
23
prejudice, are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
24
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear his/her own fees and costs.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 27, 2017
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?