Alexander, et al v. CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/25/12 ORDERING that no later than 5/30/12, plaintiffs shall obtain counsel and file a substitution of attorneys. Failure to obtain counsel will result in a recommendation this action be dismiss ed without prejudice; No later than 5/23/12, plaintiffs shall show cause why the sibling referenced in the complaint should not be joined as a party plaintiff; No later than 5/23/12, plaintiffs shall file a status report. In the status report, plaintiffs shall specifically outline what steps have been taken to effectuate service of summons in this action. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHON ALEXANDER, 11 12 Plaintiff, CIV S-11-640 MCE CKD PS vs. 13 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER 15 16 17 Defendant. ___________________________________/ This wrongful death action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 18 302(c)(21). The action arises out of the murder of plaintiffs’ father while he was incarcerated. 19 On March 21, 2011, plaintiff Jonathon Alexander was appointed as guardian ad litem to 20 represent the interests of his sister, plaintiff Amber Alexander, an incompetent person presently 21 confined to a mental institution. At the time of appointment, plaintiffs were represented by 22 counsel in this action. On April 23, 2012, counsel’s motion to withdraw was granted and 23 plaintiffs are now proceeding pro se. 24 An incompetent person can only proceed if represented by counsel. Johns v. 25 County of San Diego, 114 F. 3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997) (minors must be represented by 26 attorney); see also Meeker v. Kercher, 782 f.2d 153, 154 (10th Cir. 1986) (“it is not in the interest 1 1 of minors or incompetents that they be represented by non-attorneys”). Although plaintiff Amber 2 Alexander is not a minor, given her present confinement, she is incompetent to proceed in this 3 action on her own behalf. Plaintiff will therefore be granted a limited time period in which to 4 obtain counsel. 5 The complaint alleges that the two named plaintiffs are two of the three children 6 of the decedent. Under California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.60, all three children have the 7 right to bring a wrongful death action. Plaintiffs will therefore be directed to show cause, in 8 writing, why the third child referenced in the complaint should not be joined as a plaintiff in this 9 action. 10 This matter is currently set for status conference before the undersigned on June 6, 11 2012. The action has been pending since March 8, 2011. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 4(m), service of process is to be completed within 120 days of filing of the complaint. This 13 action has now been pending over thirteen months. At the status conference, plaintiffs are 14 advised that the status of service of summons on defendants will be addressed. 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. No later than May 30, 2012, plaintiffs shall obtain counsel and file a 17 substitution of attorneys. Failure to obtain counsel will result in a recommendation this action be 18 dismissed without prejudice. 19 2. No later than May 23, 2012, plaintiffs shall show cause why the sibling 20 referenced in the complaint should not be joined as a party plaintiff. 21 \\\ 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 2 1 3. No later than May 23, 2012, plaintiffs shall file a status report. In the status 2 report, plaintiffs shall specifically outline what steps have been taken to effectuate service of 3 summons in this action. 4 Dated: April 25, 2012 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 4 9 alexander.minor 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?