Gomez v. McDonald et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/23/13 ADOPTING in full 28 Findings and Recommendatons; DENYING 18 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants are DIRECTED to file an answer in response to plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment and Eighth Amendment claims within 30 days. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, 11 No. 2:11-cv-0649 LKK DAD P vs. 12 13 MIKE McDONALD et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 23, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2013, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 18) is denied; and 3 3. Defendants are directed to file an answer in response to plaintiff’s Fourteenth 4 Amendment and Eighth Amendment claims within thirty days. 5 DATED: August 23, 2013. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?