Gomez v. McDonald et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/15/13 granting 39 Motion to take plaintiffs deposition via videoconference. Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Case No. 2:11-CV-00649 LKK DAD (PC)
ALFREDO GOMEZ,

12
13

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
Plaintiff, REQUEST TO CONDUCT PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE

v.

14
15

MIKE McDONALD, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Defendants have requested that the court issue an order allowing defense counsel to take

19

plaintiff’s deposition via videoconference. Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of

20

Civil Procedure, the court will grant defendants’ request. Nothing in this order shall be

21

interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing

22

equipment if it is not already available.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 15, 2013

25
26
/gome0649.viddep

27
28
1