Key, et al v. IndyMac Bank

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/14/2011 ORDERING that the 17 findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2011 are adopted in full. Plaintiffs' 11 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.(Duong, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JAMES KEY, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12

No. CIV S-11-650 GEB GGH (TEMP) PS

vs.

13
INDYMAC BANK, et al.,
14
Defendants.

ORDER

15
/
16
Plaintiffs filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United
17
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
18
On May 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the
20
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiffs have not filed
21
objections to the findings and recommendations.
22
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
24
ORDERED that:
25
/////
26
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2011 are adopted in full;

2

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order (dkt. no. 11) is denied.

3 Dated: July 14, 2011
4
5
6

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2