Lawrie v. Harris et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/11 DENYING 5 Motion for attorneys fees; DENYING 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MATHEW ALAN LAWRIE,
11
Plaintiff,
12
No. CIV S-11-0698 EFB P
vs.
13
KAMALA HARRIS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court determine whether he is entitled to attorney fees
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and appoint counsel. Dckt. Nos. 5, 7.
19
I.
Motion for Appointment of Counsel
20
District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in
21
section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In
22
exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a
23
plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood
24
v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no
25
exceptional circumstances in this case.
26
////
1
1
II.
2
Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Section 1988 authorizes the court to award attorney fees in a civil rights action such as
3
this to the prevailing party. As no merits determination has yet been made in this case (the court
4
has not yet screened the complaint and no order has issued requiring service on any defendant),
5
it would be premature at this stage to award attorney fees to plaintiff. More to the point, plaintiff
6
is not entitled to attorney fees under § 1988, as he is appearing pro se. Elwood v. Drescher, 456
7
F.3d 943, 946 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, 437-38 (1991), for the
8
proposition that “§ 1988 d[oes] not authorize the award of fees to pro se litigants”).
9
III.
Order
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
11
1. Plaintiff’s April 27, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied.
12
2. Plaintiff’s March 28, 2011 motion for attorney fees is denied.
13
DATED: May 9, 2011.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?