Mosqueda v. Martel
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/9/2011 GRANTING ptnr's 2 motion to proceed IFP; respondent is DIRECTED to file a response to ptnr's 3 motion to stay w/in 14 days; the clerk to serve a copy of this order and the Order re Consent on Michael Farrell. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CARLOS MOSQUEDA,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-745 GGH
vs.
MICHAEL MARTEL,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma
18
pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to
19
afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be
20
granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
21
In addition to filing and serving a petition, petitioner has also filed and served a
22
motion for stay and abeyance, asserting that two of his three claims have been exhausted and that
23
the remaining claim is currently pending adjudication in state court.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted;
26
/////
1
1
2
2. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s motion to stay (Doc.
#3) within fourteen (14) days.
3
2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order and the
4
consent/reassignment form contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court on
5
Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.
6
DATED: May 9, 2011
7
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
8
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
GGH:014
mosq0745.ord
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?