Mosqueda v. Martel

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/9/2011 GRANTING ptnr's 2 motion to proceed IFP; respondent is DIRECTED to file a response to ptnr's 3 motion to stay w/in 14 days; the clerk to serve a copy of this order and the Order re Consent on Michael Farrell. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS MOSQUEDA, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-745 GGH vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma 18 pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to 19 afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be 20 granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 In addition to filing and serving a petition, petitioner has also filed and served a 22 motion for stay and abeyance, asserting that two of his three claims have been exhausted and that 23 the remaining claim is currently pending adjudication in state court. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; 26 ///// 1 1 2 2. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s motion to stay (Doc. #3) within fourteen (14) days. 3 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order and the 4 consent/reassignment form contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court on 5 Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. 6 DATED: May 9, 2011 7 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 8 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 GGH:014 mosq0745.ord 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?