Coronado v. Neish et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/20/12 the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Discovery is open as to additional medical issues, including as to how medical issues relate to plaintiff's employment/ability to work, and the discovery cut-off date shall be December 28, 2012; Expert discovery cut-off date shall be February 28, 2013; and Trial date shall remain May 20, 2013. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
A Professional Corporation
815 S Street, Second Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Telephone: (916) 448-7888
Facsimile: (916) 448-6888
4
5
6
ROSS R. NOTT (State Bar No. 172235)
STEPHANIE D. RICE (State Bar No. 248719)
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants
CONSTANCE NEISH, JAMES NEISH
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COREY CORONADO,
12
CASE #: 2:11-CV-00751-MCE-DAD
Plaintiff,
vs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
13
14
CONSTANCE NEISH, JAMES NEISH, et.
al.,
15
Defendants.
________________________________/
16
It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties through their respective counsel
17
18
pursuant to FRCP 29(b) that:
1.
20
21
22
This case arises out of a motor vehicle collision that occurred on February 5,
2.
19
On or about June 28, 2011, Judge England entered a Pretrial Scheduling
2009.
Order setting this matter for trial on May 20, 2013. The following additional dates were set:
23
Discovery cut-off:
July 20, 2012
24
Expert Witness Disclosure date:
September 20, 2012
25
3.
On or about May 7, 2012, plaintiff Corey Coronado underwent a two level
26
disc arthroplasty that she alleges was necessitated as result of injuries sustained in the
27
February 5, 2009 incident. As of the date of this Stipulation, plaintiff has not concluded her
28
follow up course of care and treatment. She is not slated to return to work until early
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
1
2
August.
4.
Plaintiff’s surgery in May of 2012 constitutes good cause to reopen
3
discovery. If the matter proceeds to trial, the parties will need to obtain updated records
4
reflecting her medical treatment, updated records and evidence regarding her employment
5
history and job performance, for example.
6
5.
The parties wish to mediate this case.
7
6.
Because plaintiff must be significantly recovered/stabilized following her
8
surgery before the case may be mediated, the soonest that the parties will be able to
9
conduct a mediation will be in the October/November 2012 time frame. The case is more
10
likely to settle if the sides are not heavily invested in expert discovery at the time of
11
mediation. Accordingly, the parties wish to conduct the mediation prior to incurring the
12
expense of retaining experts, disclosing experts, and conducting expert discovery.
13
14
15
16
7.
The foregoing constitutes good cause extend the judicially imposed expert
disclosure and expert discovery cut-off dates.
8.
In light of the above facts, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
Discovery is open as to additional medical issues, including as to how
17
medical issues relate to plaintiff’s employment/ability to work, and the
18
discovery cut-off date shall be December 28, 2012;
19
Expert discovery cut-off date shall be February 28, 2013; and
20
Trial date shall remain May 20, 2013.
21
DATED: September 7, 2012
ARNOLD LAW FIRM
22
By: ________/s/_______________________
CLIFFORD L. CARTER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COREY CORONADO
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: September 7, 2012
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
By: ________/s/___ ___________________
ROSS R. NOTT
STEPHANIE D. RICE
Attorneys for Defendants
CONSTANCE NEISH and JAMES NEISH
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ORDER
1
2
The parties’ stipulation and request to extend the judicially imposed expert
3
4
disclosure and expert discovery cut-off dates is GRANTED. The current Pretrial
5
Scheduling Order is vacated. An amended Pretrial Scheduling Order will issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: September 20, 2012
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
DEAC_Signature-END:
13
14
c4d6b0d3
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?