Lopez v. Cate et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/9/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 12 August 1, 2011 request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff's 12 August 1, 2011 motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file objections to the July 18, 2011 findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANDREW R. LOPEZ,
Plaintiff,
11
No. 2:11-cv-0806 MCE KJN P
vs.
12
13
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme
16
17
Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent
18
prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In
19
certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);
21
Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court
22
does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of
23
counsel will therefore be denied.
In addition, plaintiff requested an extension of time to file objections to the July
24
25
18, 2011 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, the request is granted.
26
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s August 1, 2011 request for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 12)
3
is denied;
4
2. Plaintiff’s August 1, 2011 motion for an extension of time is granted; and
5
3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file
6
objections to the July 18, 2011 findings and recommendations.
7
DATED: August 9, 2011
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
lope0806.31+36
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?