Adams v. Easley et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/3/11 VACATING hearing date of 7/8/11 and DENYING without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TYRONE ADAMS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-11-826 GEB DAD (TEMP) PS

vs.
CHARLES EASLEY, et al.,

14

ORDER

Defendants.

15

/

16

On May 31, 2011, defendants Sutter County Board of Supervisors and related

17

defendants filed a motion to dismiss. By order filed May 26, 2011, defendant Waggoman’s

18

separate motion to dismiss was granted with leave to amend. The pending motion to dismiss

19

brought on behalf of defendants Sutter County Board of Supervisors and related defendants is

20

therefore moot and will be denied without prejudice to its renewal upon the filing of an amended

21

complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. The hearing date of July 8, 2011 on the motion to dismiss is vacated; and

23

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (docket no. 16) is denied without prejudice.

24

DATED: June 3, 2011.

25
26

JMM
adams.vac