Adams v. Easley et al

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/5/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2011, are adopted in full; and this action is dismissed as to the non-appearing defendants.(Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TYRONE ADAMS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.
CHARLES EASLEY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16
17

No. CIV S-11-0826 GEB CKD PS

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local
Rule 302(c)(21).

18

On December 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

19

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

20

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.

21

Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

22

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

23

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

24

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

25

proper analysis.

26

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2011, are adopted in

3
4
5

full; and
2. This action is dismissed as to the non-appearing defendants.
Dated: January 5, 2012

6
7
8

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2