Medlyn v. Barnes
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/14/11 ordering petitioner's 06/29/11 motion to proceed in forma pauperis 18 is denied as unnecessary. Petitioner's 06/29/11 motion for appointment of counsel 19 is denied. Petitioner's motion for extension of time 20 is granted. Petitioner shall file and serve a traverse within 30 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
STEVEN MICHAEL MEDLYN,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Petitioner,
No. CIV S-11-0898 DAD P
Respondent.
ORDER
vs.
R. BARNES,
/
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On June 29, 2011, petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a
18
motion for appointment of counsel. Petitioner has already been granted leave to proceed in
19
forma pauperis. See Order filed April 21, 2011. Petitioner’s June 29, 2011 motion to proceed in
20
forma pauperis is unnecessary and will therefore be denied.
21
There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas
22
proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C.
23
§ 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice
24
so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does
25
not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present
26
time. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel will be denied.
1
1
2
Finally, on July 7, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file a
travers. Good cause appearing, that motion will be granted.
3
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Petitioner’s June 29, 2011 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 18)
5
is denied as unnecessary;
6
7
2. Petitioner’s June 29, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 19) is
denied;
8
9
3. Petitioner’s July 7, 2011 motion for extension of time (Doc. No. 20) is granted;
and
10
4. Petitioner shall file and serve a traverse within thirty days from the date of this
11
order.
12
DATED: July 14, 2011.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DAD:12:mp
medl0898.111
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?