Hooker v. Kimura-Yip et al

Filing 59

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/16/14 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/28/14 56 are ADOPTED in full; and the Second Amended Complaint 54 is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD OLIVER HOOKER, 12 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-0899 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. KIMURA-YIP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 28, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff was granted an 23 extension of time to file objections up to and including November 28, 2014. Plaintiff has not 24 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 28, 2014, are adopted in full; and 1 1 2. The Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 54) is dismissed without prejudice. 2 3 4 Dated: December 16, 2014 5 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?