Whitaker et al v. Health Net of California Inc et al
Filing
73
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/08/12 ORDERING that 2:11-cv-0910 KJM DAD and 2:12-cv-1171 KJM EFB are RELATED; 2:12-cv-1171 KJM DAD is CONSOLIDATED with the related action 2:11-cv-0910 KJM DAD. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DWIGHT WHITAKER; et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
No. CIV S-11-0910 KJM-DAD
vs.
HEALTH NET OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; et al.,
Defendants.
14
/
15
ADRIENNE G JANIS,
16
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-12-1171 KJM-EFB
17
vs.
18
HEALTH NET, INC.; et al.,
ORDER
19
Defendants.
20
21
/
Examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within
22
the meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Here, “both actions involve the same . . . transaction, or
23
event” and “similar questions of fact and the same question of law and their assignment to the
24
same Judge or Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort.” Local
25
Rule 123(a)(2) & (3). Accordingly, the assignment of these matters to the same judge is likely to
26
effect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is likely to be convenient for the parties.
1
1
Likewise, consolidation of these matters is appropriate as these actions involve common
2
questions of law and fact. FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(3).
3
As a result, it is hereby ORDERED that CIV S-12-1171, is reassigned from
4
Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Henceforth, the
5
caption on documents filed in this reassigned case shall be shown as: CIV S-12-1171 KJM-
6
DAD.
7
8
9
10
It is further ORDERED that once this action is transferred to Magistrate Judge
Drozd, it should be consolidated with the related action captioned CIV S-11-0910 KJM-DAD.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 8, 2012.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?