Whitaker et al v. Health Net of California Inc et al

Filing 73

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/08/12 ORDERING that 2:11-cv-0910 KJM DAD and 2:12-cv-1171 KJM EFB are RELATED; 2:12-cv-1171 KJM DAD is CONSOLIDATED with the related action 2:11-cv-0910 KJM DAD. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWIGHT WHITAKER; et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-11-0910 KJM-DAD vs. HEALTH NET OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 ADRIENNE G JANIS, 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-12-1171 KJM-EFB 17 vs. 18 HEALTH NET, INC.; et al., ORDER 19 Defendants. 20 21 / Examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within 22 the meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Here, “both actions involve the same . . . transaction, or 23 event” and “similar questions of fact and the same question of law and their assignment to the 24 same Judge or Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort.” Local 25 Rule 123(a)(2) & (3). Accordingly, the assignment of these matters to the same judge is likely to 26 effect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is likely to be convenient for the parties. 1 1 Likewise, consolidation of these matters is appropriate as these actions involve common 2 questions of law and fact. FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(3). 3 As a result, it is hereby ORDERED that CIV S-12-1171, is reassigned from 4 Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Henceforth, the 5 caption on documents filed in this reassigned case shall be shown as: CIV S-12-1171 KJM- 6 DAD. 7 8 9 10 It is further ORDERED that once this action is transferred to Magistrate Judge Drozd, it should be consolidated with the related action captioned CIV S-11-0910 KJM-DAD. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 8, 2012. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?