Adams v. Easley et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/11 ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 4 Motion for TRO. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TYRONE L. ADAMS,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. CIV S-11-0913 JAM EFB PS

vs.

13

CHARLES L. EASLEY, et al.,

14

Defendants.
__________________________________/

ORDER

15
16

On April 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

17

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

18

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

19

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

20

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

21

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

22

1983).

23

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

24

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

25

////

26

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

2

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2011, are

3
4
5

ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, Dckt. No. 4, is denied.
DATED: June 30, 2011

6
7

/s/ John A. Mendez

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2