Adams v. Easley et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/11 ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 4 Motion for TRO. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TYRONE L. ADAMS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
No. CIV S-11-0913 JAM EFB PS
vs.
13
CHARLES L. EASLEY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER
15
16
On April 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
17
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
18
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
19
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.
20
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
21
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
22
1983).
23
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
24
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
25
////
26
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2011, are
3
4
5
ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, Dckt. No. 4, is denied.
DATED: June 30, 2011
6
7
/s/ John A. Mendez
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?