Adams v. Easley et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/25/2011 ORDERING defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss hearing is continued to 9/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB); plaintiff's 17 Motion to Amend will also be heard on 9/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB); On or before 8/24/2011, defendants shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Amend; Plaintiff may file a reply on or before 8/31/2011; defendant's may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition to 10 Motion to Dismiss on or before 8/31/2011; Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Appear Telephonically is DENIED as MOOT; Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Extension of time to serve some of the unserved defendants, is GR ANTED; plaintiff has until 11/2/2011 to serve remaining defendants and file a proof of such service; Status Conference is RESET for 12/21/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB); Parties shall file status reports on or before 12/7/2011. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TYRONE L. ADAMS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. CIV S-11-0913 JAM EFB PS
vs.
13
CHARLES L. EASLEY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER
15
16
This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to
17
Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 22,
18
2011, several of the defendants in this action filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended
19
complaint and noticed the motion to be heard on August 3, 2011. Dckt. No. 10. On July 21,
20
2011, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 18; a motion to
21
amend his amended complaint, Dckt. No. 17; and a motion to appear telephonically at the
22
August 3 hearing, Dckt. No. 19.
23
Local Rule 230(e) provides that related or counter-motions “shall be served and filed in
24
the manner and on the date prescribed for the filing of opposition” and assumes that, unless the
25
court finds that a continuance is warranted, related motions will be heard on the same day as the
26
original motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(e) (“Any counter-motion or other motion that a party may
1
1
desire to make that is related to the general subject matter of the original motion shall be served
2
and filed in the manner and on the date prescribed for the filing of opposition. If a
3
counter-motion or other related motion is filed, the Court may continue the hearing on the
4
original and all related motions so as to give all parties reasonable opportunity to serve and file
5
oppositions and replies to all pending motions.”). Because plaintiff’s motion to amend his
6
amended complaint, Dckt. No. 17, relates to the motion to dismiss that is currently scheduled for
7
hearing on August 3, Dckt. No. 10, the hearing on that motion to dismiss will be continued in
8
order to give defendants an opportunity to respond to the motion to amend. Accordingly,
9
plaintiff’s motion to appear telephonically at the August 3 hearing, Dckt. No. 19, will be denied
10
11
as moot.
Also on July 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to serve some of
12
the unserved defendants. Dckt. No. 16. Rule 4(m) provides that “[i]f service of the summons
13
and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the
14
court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action
15
without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time;
16
provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for
17
service for an appropriate period.” For the reasons provided in plaintiff’s motion for an
18
extension of time to serve, plaintiff will be given a limited extension of time to serve any
19
remaining unserved defendants.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1. The hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 10, is continued to
22
23
24
25
26
September 7, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24.
2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend, Dckt. No. 17, will also be heard on September 7, 2011 at
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24.
3. On or before August 24, 2011, defendants shall file an opposition or statement of nonopposition to plaintiff’s motion to amend.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
4. On or before August 31, 2011, plaintiff may file a reply to any opposition filed by
defendants.
5. On or before August 31, 2011, defendants may file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition to
defendants’ motion to dismiss.
6. Plaintiff’s motion to appear telephonically at the August 3 hearing, Dckt. No. 19, is
denied as moot.
7
7. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve some of the unserved defendants,
8
Dckt. No. 16, is granted. Plaintiff has until November 2, 2011 to serve any remaining unserved
9
defendants and file a proof of such service with the court.
10
11
12
13
14
15
8. The status conference currently scheduled for August 17, 2011, is rescheduled for
December 21, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24.
9. On or before December 7, 2011, the parties shall file status reports addressing the
matters referenced in the court’s April 5, 2011 order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2011.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?