North Sacramento Land Company et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING that the schedule is adjusted as follows: administrative record to be filed 8/31/2011; motions to supplement the record to be filed 9/30/2011; opposition to motions to supplem ent record to be filed by 10/21/2011; replies to motions to supplement record to be filed by 11/4/2011. If Pltfs file a motion to supplement administrative record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on that motion. (Zignago, K.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
5
NORTH SACRAMENTO LAND
COMPANY; et al.,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-943-JAM-KJN
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME
6
v.
7
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE; et al.,
8
9
Defendants.
10
11
12
ORDER
Based on the stipulation filed by the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the schedule for this
case is adjusted as follows:
13
14
August 31, 2011:
Administrative Record Filed
16
September 30, 2011:
Any Motions to Supplement Administrative Record
17
October 21, 2011:
Oppositions to Motions to Supplement Administrative Record
18
November 4, 2011:
Replies for Motions to Supplement Administrative Record
15
19
20
The existing schedule for Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) remains in effect, but will
21
22
be automatically stayed if a Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record is filed. If Plaintiffs file a
23
Motion to Supplement Administrative Record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within
24
10 days after the Court acts on that motion.
25
26
DATED: 7/15/2011
27
28
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
___________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
2:11-CV-943-JAM-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?