North Sacramento Land Company et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING that the schedule is adjusted as follows: administrative record to be filed 8/31/2011; motions to supplement the record to be filed 9/30/2011; opposition to motions to supplem ent record to be filed by 10/21/2011; replies to motions to supplement record to be filed by 11/4/2011. If Pltfs file a motion to supplement administrative record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on that motion. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 NORTH SACRAMENTO LAND COMPANY; et al., CASE NO. 2:11-CV-943-JAM-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 6 v. 7 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; et al., 8 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 ORDER Based on the stipulation filed by the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the schedule for this case is adjusted as follows: 13 14 August 31, 2011: Administrative Record Filed 16 September 30, 2011: Any Motions to Supplement Administrative Record 17 October 21, 2011: Oppositions to Motions to Supplement Administrative Record 18 November 4, 2011: Replies for Motions to Supplement Administrative Record 15 19 20 The existing schedule for Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) remains in effect, but will 21 22 be automatically stayed if a Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record is filed. If Plaintiffs file a 23 Motion to Supplement Administrative Record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 24 10 days after the Court acts on that motion. 25 26 DATED: 7/15/2011 27 28 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ___________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 2:11-CV-943-JAM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?