Dunigan v. Hickman et al
Filing
150
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/24/15 DECLINING to issue COA. (cc: 9th Circuit) (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN DUNIGAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:11-cv-00961-MCE-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
ROBERT HICKMAN,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 5, 2013, the Court dismissed this
19
action without prejudice and judgment was duly entered. ECF No. 102, 103. Petitioner
20
then moved to vacate the judgment. ECF No. 143. On February 13, 2015, the Court
21
denied petitioner’s motion to vacate judgment, ECF No. 144, but did not issue or deny a
22
certificate of appealability at the time the final order was entered. See Rule 11(a), Rules
23
Governing § 2254 Cases.
24
A court shall issue a certificate of appealability where the petitioner has shown
25
“that reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved
26
in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve
27
encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003)
28
(internal quotation marks omitted). Reasonable jurists could not debate that petitioner’s
1
1
2
motion to vacate the judgment lacked merit.
Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of
3
the Court is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
4
for filing on the docket of Case No. 14-15743.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?