Dunigan v. Hickman et al

Filing 150

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/24/15 DECLINING to issue COA. (cc: 9th Circuit) (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN DUNIGAN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-00961-MCE-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER ROBERT HICKMAN, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 5, 2013, the Court dismissed this 19 action without prejudice and judgment was duly entered. ECF No. 102, 103. Petitioner 20 then moved to vacate the judgment. ECF No. 143. On February 13, 2015, the Court 21 denied petitioner’s motion to vacate judgment, ECF No. 144, but did not issue or deny a 22 certificate of appealability at the time the final order was entered. See Rule 11(a), Rules 23 Governing § 2254 Cases. 24 A court shall issue a certificate of appealability where the petitioner has shown 25 “that reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved 26 in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve 27 encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003) 28 (internal quotation marks omitted). Reasonable jurists could not debate that petitioner’s 1 1 2 motion to vacate the judgment lacked merit. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of 3 the Court is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 4 for filing on the docket of Case No. 14-15743. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 24, 2015 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?