Armstrong v. Garcia, et al

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/15/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendant P. Mangis is DISMISSED.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADY ARMSTRONG, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-0965-GEB-KJN-P vs. SILVA GARCIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On November 20, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 (dkt. no. 58) herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 21 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Plaintiff was granted an extension of time by order filed December 18, 2012, (dkt no. 61) and 23 again on February 6, 2013, (dkt. no. 64). The date for filing those objections has passed, 24 however, neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 1 ORDERED that: 2 3 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2012, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendant Mangis is dismissed. Dated: March 15, 2013 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?