United States of America v. Approximately $658,830.00 in U.S. Currency
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/22/12: This court's order (Dkt. No. 94) granting Claimant Robert Gibson's an extension of time until July 10, 2012 to file and serve his single amended opposition is reaffirmed. Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief with seven days from the latter of: (1) the date Mr. Gibson files a further amended opposition; or (2) July 10, 2012. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-00967 MCE KJN PS
v.
APPROXIMATELY $658,830.00 IN
U.S. CURRENCY,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
On June 19, 2012, this court granted (Dkt. No. 94) a motion by claimant Robert
17
D. Gibson (Dkt. No. 93) in this civil forfeiture action for an extension of Mr. Gibson’s time to
18
file an amended opposition to the government’s Motion To Strike Claim And Answer For Failure
19
To Comply With Supp Rules G(5) And G(6); Alternatively, For Summary Judgment (“Motion”)
20
(Dkt. No. 77.). The court extended until July 10, 2012, Mr. Gibson’s deadline to file his
21
amended opposition. Concurrently, on June 19, 2012, Mr. Gibson filed an amended opposition
22
that appears to have been rushed because Mr. Gibson was unaware the court had granted him
23
more time to file. (Dkt. No. 95.)
24
This court hereby reaffirms that Mr. Gibson has until July 10, 2012 to file a single
25
amended opposition to the government’s. If Mr. Gibson chooses to revise his amended
26
opposition and refile it and any exhibits thereto by July 10, 2012, this court will consider only the
1
1
later-filed amended opposition. If Mr. Gibson chooses not to file another amended opposition by
2
July 10, 2012, the court will consider only the amended opposition and the exhibits that Mr.
3
Gibson filed on June 19, 2012. The government may file a reply brief with seven days from the
4
latter of: (1) the date Mr. Gibson files a further amended opposition; or (2) July 10, 2012.
5
The court reminds Mr. Gibson that his failure to adhere to Local Rule 260(b) is
6
grounds for this court to grant summary judgment to the government. As stated in this court’s
7
prior order:
8
In his amended opposition, Mr. Gibson shall reproduce the
itemized facts in the government’s Statement of Undisputed
Facts (Dkt. No. 77, Doc. 77-2) and admit those facts that are
undisputed and deny those that he disputes, including with
each denial a citation to the particular portions of any
pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer,
admission, or other document he relies upon in support of that
denial. Mr. Gibson may also file a concise “Statement of Disputed
Facts,” and the source thereof in the record, of all additional
material facts as to which there is a genuine issue precluding
summary judgment or adjudication. Further, Mr. Gibson has a
right to file counter-affidavits or other documentary evidence along
with his amended opposition.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Failure to comply with this order may result in the court
taking the government’s evidence as the truth and entering
summary judgment for the government, which will strike Mr.
Gibson’s claim and terminate completely his involvement in
this civil forfeiture action.
16
17
18
(Dkt. No. 85.)
19
////
20
////
21
////
22
////
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
////
2
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This court’s order (Dkt. No. 94) granting Claimant Robert Gibson’s an
3
extension of time until July 10, 2012 to file and serve his single amended opposition is
4
reaffirmed.
5
6
7
8
2. Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief with seven days from the
latter of: (1) the date Mr. Gibson files a further amended opposition; or (2) July 10, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 22, 2012
9
10
11
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?