Howard v. Martel

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/25/2011. Petitioner's 8/17/2011 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel is GRANTED and attorney David M. Porter is APPOINTED as counsel for Gerald Howard. Status Conference set for 10/19/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD HOWARD, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. M. MARTEL, ORDER Respondent. 15 16 No. CIV S-11-0991 JAM CKD P / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an 17 application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the complexity of 18 the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require 19 appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 20 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Petitioner’s August 17, 2011 motion to appoint counsel is granted. 23 2. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. 24 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order 25 26 on David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender. 4. Petitioner’s counsel shall contact the Clerk’s Office to make arrangements for 1 1 copies of documents in the file. 2 5. A status conference is set for October 19, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26. 3 6. All parties shall appear at the status conference by counsel prepared to discuss: 4 5 a. The formulation and simplification of the issues, including elimination of frivolous claims and defenses; 6 a. Enumeration and resolution of unexhausted claims; and 7 c. Possible future amendments to the pleadings. 8 Dated: August 25, 2011 9 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 2 howa0991.110a 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?