Howard v. Martel
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/25/2011. Petitioner's 8/17/2011 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel is GRANTED and attorney David M. Porter is APPOINTED as counsel for Gerald Howard. Status Conference set for 10/19/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GERALD HOWARD,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
vs.
M. MARTEL,
ORDER
Respondent.
15
16
No. CIV S-11-0991 JAM CKD P
/
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an
17
application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the complexity of
18
the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require
19
appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d
20
952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. Petitioner’s August 17, 2011 motion to appoint counsel is granted.
23
2. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner.
24
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order
25
26
on David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender.
4. Petitioner’s counsel shall contact the Clerk’s Office to make arrangements for
1
1
copies of documents in the file.
2
5. A status conference is set for October 19, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26.
3
6. All parties shall appear at the status conference by counsel prepared to discuss:
4
5
a. The formulation and simplification of the issues, including elimination
of frivolous claims and defenses;
6
a. Enumeration and resolution of unexhausted claims; and
7
c. Possible future amendments to the pleadings.
8
Dated: August 25, 2011
9
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
2
howa0991.110a
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?