Kurtz v. Intelius, Inc et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/5/11 re 6 ORDERING that the time for the Intelius Defendants to respond to plaintiff's complaint is extended by 28 days from May 12, 2011 to June 9, 2011.(Duong, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MICHAEL KURTZ, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated
California residents,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
INTELIUS INC., A Delaware
Corporation; INTELIUS SALES
COMPANY LLC, a/k/a Intelius Sales
Company, LLC, A Nevada Limited
Liability Company and ADAPTIVE
MARKETING LLC, A Delaware
Limited Liability Company,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case No. 2:11-CV-01009-JAM-JFM
Assigned for all purposes to
Hon. John A. Mendez
ORDER ON INTELIUS
DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN INITIAL
28-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

1

Upon consideration of Defendants Intelius Inc. and Intelius Sales Company

2

LLC’s (collectively, “Intelius Defendants”) ex parte application for an initial

3

28-day extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint, and good

4

cause appearing, the Intelius Defendants’ ex parte application is GRANTED.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for the Intelius Defendants to

6

respond to plaintiff’s complaint is extended by 28 days—from May 12, 2011 to

7

June 9, 2011.

8

SO ORDERED this 5th day of May, 2011.

9
10

/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com