Tillman v Board of Parole Hearings

Filing 16

USCA ORDER as to 10 Notice of Interlocuatory Appeal: The judgment of this Court, entered 1/11/2012, takes effect this date. (Michel, G)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED
FEB 13 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ANTHONY BRYANT TILLMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS,

No. 11-18032
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01011-MCE-DAD
U.S. District Court for Eastern
California, Sacramento
MANDATE

Defendant - Appellee.

The judgment of this Court, entered January 11, 2012, takes effect this date.
This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule
41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
FOR THE COURT:
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
Synitha Walker
Deputy Clerk

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY BRYANT TILLMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.

JAN 11 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

No. 11-18032
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01011-MCE
Eastern District of California,
Sacramento

BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS,
ORDER
Defendant - Appellee.

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable.
See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judge’s
findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by
subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Appellant has not filed a
notice of appeal from the district court’s final judgment entered on January 9,
2012. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.

MF/Pro Se