Davis v. Sacramento County Jail et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/25/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/7/12 57 are ADOPTED in full; Defendant Woodward's 4/2/12 MOTION to Dismiss 47 is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRENCE LAMONT DAVIS, Plaintiff, 11 No. CIV S-11-1027 WBS CKD P vs. 12 13 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 7, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2012, are adopted in full; and 2 2. Defendant Woodward’s April 2, 2012 motion to dismiss is denied. 3 DATED: June 25, 2012 4 5 6 7 8 9 davi1027.801 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?