Davis v. Sacramento County Jail et al
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/3/2012 ORDERING 68 that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge # 62 is AFFIRMED; Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
TERRENCE LAMONT DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
10
11
No. 2:11-cv-1027-WBS CKD P
vs.
12
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
ORDER
On July 26, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate
16
judge’s order filed May 29, 2012 denying plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel.
17
Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly
18
erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not
19
appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
20
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of
21
the magistrate judge filed May 29, 2012 is affirmed. Plaintiff’s request for appointment of
22
counsel is denied without prejudice.
23
DATED: August 3, 2012
24
25
26
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
