Davis v. Sacramento County Jail et al

Filing 96

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/29/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TERRENCE LAMONT DAVIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-1027 TLN CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al,

15

Defendants.

16
By order filed April 16, 2013, the court directed plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or

17
18

before May 16, 2013. Plaintiff has not filed his pretrial statement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

19

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

21

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

22

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

23

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

24

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

25

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

2

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 29, 2013

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1
davi1027.fpt

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2