McCune v. Kidder

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/6/11 ORDERING that Defendant JAMES R. KIDDER, TRUSTEE of the JAMES R. KIDDER TRUST ESTABLISHED APRIL 17, 1998's response to Plaintiff's Complaint will be due no later than August 1, 2011. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 TRAINOR FAIRBROOK DANIEL M. STEINBERG (SBN 194948) 980 Fulton Avenue Sacramento, California 95825-4558 Telephone: (916) 929-7000 Facsimile: (916) 929-7111 4 mlr:4410024.934566.1 5 Attorneys for Defendant JAMES R. KIDDER, TRUSTEE OF THE JAMES R. KIDDER TRUST ESTABLISHED APRIL 17, 1998 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 At t o rn ey s At L a w 980 FULTON AVENUE SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95825-4558 Telephone: (916) 929-7000 Facs imile: (916) 929-7111 TRAINOR FAIRBROOK 11 MICHAEL McCUNE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JAMES R. KIDDER, TRUSTEE of the JAMES R. KIDDER TRUST ESTABLISHED APRIL 17, 1998, 15 16 Case No. 2:11-CV-01043-JAM-GGH ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: April 19, 2011 Defendant. 17 18 As stipulated by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel, 19 Defendant JAMES R. KIDDER, TRUSTEE of the JAMES R. KIDDER TRUST ESTABLISHED 20 APRIL 17, 1998 is granted an extension until August 1, 2011 to respond or otherwise plead 21 reference to Plaintiff's Complaint. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant JAMES R. KIDDER, TRUSTEE of the JAMES R. 23 KIDDER TRUST ESTABLISHED APRIL 17, 1998's response to Plaintiff's Complaint will be 24 due no later than August 1, 2011. 25 Dated: July 6, 2011 26 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ 27 Hon. John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Case No. 2:11-CV-01043-JAM-GGH) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?