Tenore v. Goodgame et al
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/18/15 DENYING 104 Findings and Recommendations; the Court will try this action in April of 2015 as scheduled. Neither side need file a Pretrial Statement. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
MICHAEL TENORE,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:11-cv-1082 WBS CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
NATHANAEL GOODGAME, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On December 8, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on both parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
23
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff belatedly filed objections
24
(ECF No. 105), and defendants filed a response to the objections (ECF No. 108).
25
In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, the court finds the recommended dismissal too severe a
26
sanction for plaintiff’s failure to file a pretrial statement. Accordingly, the findings and
27
recommendations of the magistrate judge are rejected, and the court will try this action in April of
28
2015 as scheduled. Neither side need file a Pretrial Statement.
1
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: February 18, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2 / teno1082.805
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?