Tenore v. Goodgame et al

Filing 109

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/18/15 DENYING 104 Findings and Recommendations; the Court will try this action in April of 2015 as scheduled. Neither side need file a Pretrial Statement. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MICHAEL TENORE, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:11-cv-1082 WBS CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NATHANAEL GOODGAME, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On December 8, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on both parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff belatedly filed objections 24 (ECF No. 105), and defendants filed a response to the objections (ECF No. 108). 25 In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, the court finds the recommended dismissal too severe a 26 sanction for plaintiff’s failure to file a pretrial statement. Accordingly, the findings and 27 recommendations of the magistrate judge are rejected, and the court will try this action in April of 28 2015 as scheduled. Neither side need file a Pretrial Statement. 1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: February 18, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 / teno1082.805 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?