Tenore v. Goodgame et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/6/13 denying 40 Motion for Court-Ordered Access Via Correspondence. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL TENORE, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-1082 WBS CKD P vs. NATHANAEL GOODGAME, et al., Defendants. ORDER / This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is in the discovery stage. 17 In the motion before the court, plaintiff seeks an order granting him frequent contact with his 18 “inmate paralegal assistant and witness” Thomas Hightower (No. J98566), including the ability 19 to mail legal materials to each other at their respective institutions. Plaintiff is currently 20 incarcerated at Valley State Prison; Mr. Hightower is at Mule Creek State Prison. Plaintiff does 21 not explain what knowledge Hightower has of facts relevant to the instant claims. (Dkt. No. 40.) 22 Defendants have opposed the motion. (Dkt .No. 41.) They assert that plaintiff 23 can request approval to correspond with Hightower pursuant to California Code of Regulations 24 tit. 15 § 3139, which sets forth a procedure by which inmates may apply to correspond with other 25 inmates. “There shall be no limits set on the number of times approved inmates . . . can 26 correspond with each other” unless approval is revoked due to disciplinary, safety or security 1 1 reasons. 15 Cal. Code Regs. § 3139(d). 2 As plaintiff does not allege that he requested to correspond with Hightower 3 through available means, or that such a request was unreasonably denied, the court will deny 4 plaintiff’s motion. 5 6 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff’s January 14, 2013 Motion for Court-Ordered Access Via Correspondence (Dkt. No. 40) is denied. Dated: February 6, 2013 8 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 2 teno1082.ord3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?