Fernandez v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/8/2014 ORDERING that the 65 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Amend is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
BRANDON ALEXANDER
FERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:11-cv-1125 MCE KJN P
ORDER
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION & REHABILITATION, et
al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action
19
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
20
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On April 9, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
22
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 9, 2014, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s March 6, 2014 motion to amend (ECF No. 60) is denied.
4
Dated: July 8, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?