Fernandez v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/8/2014 ORDERING that the 65 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Amend is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 BRANDON ALEXANDER FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:11-cv-1125 MCE KJN P ORDER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION & REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action 19 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On April 9, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 9, 2014, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s March 6, 2014 motion to amend (ECF No. 60) is denied. 4 Dated: July 8, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?