Thomas v. Antipov et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/18/12 DENYING 46 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMAAL THOMAS, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-1138 MCE EFB P ANTIPOV, et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 16 ORDER Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 7, 2012, plaintiff requested that default be entered against defendant 18 Antipov. Dckt. No. 46. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) states that “[w]hen a party against 19 whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend . . . the 20 clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Defendant Antipov served an 21 answer on January 31, 2012 and has not “failed to plead or otherwise defend.” Dckt. No. 24. 22 Moreover, plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 12, 2012, and the court extended the 23 time by which Antipov must respond to that complaint.1 Dckt. Nos. 31, 38. Plaintiff has not 24 shown he is entitled to entry of default. 25 1 26 Since then, plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint which seeks to add “Dr. Maciel” as a defendant. See Dckt. Nos. 44, 45. 1 1 2 Accordingly, plaintiff’s request, Dckt. No. 46, is denied. Dated: May 18, 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?