Thomas v. Antipov et al
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 82 , 83 motion to amend; defendants' answers to the second amended complaint are adequate and they are not required to file new answers. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMAAL THOMAS,
12
No. 2:11-cv-1138-MCE-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ANTIPOV, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel in a civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 12, 2013, he moved to amend his complaint to
19
include the “attached sheet,” that he inadvertently omitted from the operative second amended
20
complaint (ECF No. 45). The proposed amendment includes plaintiff’s request for relief in this
21
action. See ECF No. 83 at 10. Defendants do not oppose the amendment. ECF No. 84.
22
Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF Nos. 82, 83) is granted.
23
Defendants’ answers to the second amended complaint are adequate and they are not required to
24
file new answers.
25
Dated: September 10, 2013.
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?