Thomas v. Antipov et al

Filing 85

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 82 , 83 motion to amend; defendants' answers to the second amended complaint are adequate and they are not required to file new answers. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMAAL THOMAS, 12 No. 2:11-cv-1138-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ANTIPOV, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel in a civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 12, 2013, he moved to amend his complaint to 19 include the “attached sheet,” that he inadvertently omitted from the operative second amended 20 complaint (ECF No. 45). The proposed amendment includes plaintiff’s request for relief in this 21 action. See ECF No. 83 at 10. Defendants do not oppose the amendment. ECF No. 84. 22 Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF Nos. 82, 83) is granted. 23 Defendants’ answers to the second amended complaint are adequate and they are not required to 24 file new answers. 25 Dated: September 10, 2013. 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?