Jackson v. Pletcher et al
Filing
102
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/18/12 DISMISSING D. Mehta with prejudice. (Manzer, C)
3
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
(916) 456-1122
(916) 737-1126 (fax)
4
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
5
Attorneys for defendants
CATE, OSMAN, JOLLEY,
MEHTA and SABIN
1
2
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR.,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
STEVE PLETCHER, et al.,
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO: 2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
DEFENDANT MEHTA
15
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Mehta
Page 1
1
The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby
2
stipulate to the dismissal of defendant MEHTA from this action with prejudice, each side
3
to bear his own costs and attorneys fees.
4
Dated: 5/14/12
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARTIN
By: /s/ “Paul Martin” (original signature retained by counsel)
PAUL MARTIN, CSB 154076
Attorneys for plaintiff
RAYMOND JACKSON, SR.
5
6
7
8
Dated: 5/16/12
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
9
By: /s/ Kathleen J. Williams
KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021
Attorneys for defendants CATE,
OSMAN, JOLLEY, MEHTA and SABIN
10
11
12
Dated: 5/4/12
HASSARD BONNINGTON, LLP
13
By: /s/ “Marcell Neri” (original signature retained by counsel)
MARCELL P. NERI, CSB 258537
WESLEY PRATT, CSB 191159
Attorneys for defendant PLETCHER
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED
17
Dated: May 18, 2012
18
/s/ John A. Mendez
John A. Mendez, Judge
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Mehta
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?