Jackson v. Pletcher et al

Filing 175

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/13 denying 171 Motion for Extension of time; denying 172 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RAYMOND D. JACKSON,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
STEVEN PLETCHER, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. 2: 11-cv-1157 JAM KJN P

ORDER
/

Plaintiff Raymond Jackson, who proceeds in this action with court-appointed

17

counsel, Mr. Paul Martin, has filed two motions in pro se. However, because plaintiff is legally

18

represented, he is required to appear in this court only through his appointed counsel.

19
20
21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions filed December
26, 2012 (Dkt. No. 171), and January 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 172), are denied without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 7, 2013

23
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26

jack1157.deny.pro se mtns.

1